(Faster-loading
version)
(from left) Andrew Ely, me, Frank Wu,
The Horror Film Buff, Genevieve Iseult Eldredge
(Faster-loading
version)
(from left) Andrew Ely, Alyce Wilson, Frank Wu,
Brianna Wu (front), The Horror Film Buff, Genevieve Iseult Eldredge.
(Faster-loading
version)
(from left) Andrew Ely, Alyce Wilson, Frank Wu, The
Horror Film Buff.
I claim the foam sword after the battle of the Wus.
VS.
The audience comes up with the combatants, and the panelists figure
out who would win. Forget Alien vs. Predator... how about Bugs Bunny
vs. Doctor Doom!
The Horror Film Buff (mod), Genevieve Iseult Eldredge,
Alyce Wilson, Frank Wu, Andrew C. Ely
Frank was the last one to arrive, after we'd already done our mic checks.
As he walked up the aisle, I told him that he'd scared the living daylights
out of me the other day by rushing into a panel with his light saber.
He sat down next to me, and his wife, Brianna, ran up at the beginning
of the panel and battled him. This time, she had a foam sword and he
had a Nerf gun.
The Horror Film Buff was supposed to be the moderator, but Frank took
over. It was his idea to come up with brackets, so that we could have
a tournament. Some suggestions came from the panel members and some
from the audience. As each pairing was announced, we'd argue on who
should win. They were as follows:
Reagan versus Gorbachev: Based on the scar on Gorbie's forehead,
we reasoned that he was Harry Potter in disguise and Reagan was really
Voldemort. Therefore, Gorbie wins.
Bob Barker versus William Shatner: Despite his age, Bob Barker
is resourceful. He could use his various props from The Price is
Right as weapons. Also, the animals would fight on his side. Bob
Barker wins.
Picard versus Kirk: Though it might seem a fairly even battle,
Kirk would stun Picard with his bad acting and then knock him down.
Kirk wins.
Greedo versus Han Solo: It doesn't matter who shot first. Han
Solo wins. I argued for the cantina musicians, whom no one is watching
and therefore would have the jump on both.
Roger Moore's James Bond versus Sean Connery's James Bond: Sean
Connery wins primarily based on the coolness factor. After all, he can
unzip a wet suit and have a dry suit underneath.
Angelina Jolie versus Jennifer Aniston: Not only can Angelina
Jolie handle weapons (or at least prop ones), but her lips could be
used as a weapon. Angelina wins.
Jeannie of I Dream of Jeannie versus Samantha Stevens of
Bewitched: By the time Jeannie would have finished putting
her arms together and nodding her head, Samantha would have already
twitched her nose and sent her packing. Samantha wins.
Dick York's Darin from Bewitched versus Dick Sargent's Darin:
Since Dick York had a bad back, which caused him to lead the show, Dick
Sargent would clearly win.
Pikachu of Pokemon versus Stitch of Lilo & Stitch:
Pikachu's only defense is to say his own name and jolt people.
Stitch eats nails. He could swallow Pikachu, and then burp electric
clouds. Plus, Disney always wins. Match goes to Stitch.
Lestat of Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles versus Edward of
the Twilight series: At this point, the "voice of God,"
i.e. the sound tech, spoke into his mic and said, "Vampires do
not sparkle." They do not. Lestat wins.
All of the Kzinti from the Kzinti Wars series versus Aslan
of the Narnia series: Even with the Kzinti combining forces,
they could not win against the combined forces of magical creatures
and humans fighting on behalf of Aslan. Plus, if you kill Aslan, he
just comes back. Aslan wins.
ROUND TWO
Lestat versus Gorbachev: Since Gorbie is, of course, STILL Harry
Potter, he would win. Plus, he has nukes.
Bob Barker versus Han Solo: Bob Barker still has all the animals
on his side, whereas Han Solo only has Chewbacca. Bob Barker wins.
Angelina Jolie versus Aslan: Angelina would cut Aslan in half
with her lips and bury the halves in separte areas so that Aslan cannot
regenerate. Angelina wins.
Samantha Stevens versus Stitch: Since she's used to magical
things going awry, Stitch's antics would not upset her. Plus, if she
needs help, she has her witchy mother, whereas Stitch only has Lilo.
Samantha wins.
Dick Sargent versus Kirk: It doesn't even matter which Kirk
he's fighting, Dick Sargent would lose to any of them. Kirk wins.
Sean Connery's Bond versus new challenger Batman of the 1940s comics:
Although they both have really cool toys, Batman also has a suit.
Batman wins.
ROUND THREE
Gorbachev versus Kirk: Even though Gorbie is both Harry Potter
and has nukes, Kirk has Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry and
a ship that can blow up an entire planet. Kirk wins.
Batman versus Angelina Jolie: Batman's utility belt is no match
for Angelina's lips. Angelina wins.
Samantha Stevens versus Bob Barker: Bob Barker has the animals,
plus he also has millions of fans. Samantha just has wimpy Darin and
her mercurial mother. Bob Barker is also cooler. Bob Barker wins.
FINAL ROUND
Kirk versus Angelina Jolie versus Bob Barker: At this point,
one of the audience members informed us that Bob Barker a black belt
in karate, tipping the match in his favor. Kirk and Angelina would distract
each other by going off in the bushes together, and Bob Barker would
drop a toaster on them.
BOB BARKER WINS!
For the rest of the day, whenever I saw anybody I knew,
I'd ask them, "Guess who won 'Vs.' Bob Barker!" The look of
surprise on their face was wonderful.
Every time I passed a fellow "Vs." panelist,
we'd say, "Bob Barker. How did we let that happen?"
(Faster-loading
version)
(from left) The Cheshire Cat, Bud Sparhawk,
David Louis Edelman, Cory Doctorow, Tom Purdom
Next, The Gryphon wanted to go to The Cheshire Cat's panel:
Science Fiction for the Post Human Future
If the singularity actually happens and the future becomes incomprehensible,
what will Science Fiction writers write about?
Tom Purdom (mod), Cory Doctorow, Bud Sparhawk, David Louis Edelman,
The Cheshire Cat
We walked in a little late, because the previous panel hadn't ended
until the very last minute. I don't think we missed much beyond the
introductions, though.
Cory Doctorow suggested that "We're already there." He explained
that if you view evolution not just as adaptation to circumstance but
as a progress to perfection, singularities are just a reflection of
that progress.
Bud Sparhawk and David Louis Edelman agreed that the march of scientific
progress has been accelerating, leading to some authors being incapable
even now of keeping ahead of the latest developments. Sparhawk added
that, really, SF is generally not predictive anyway but rather, cautionary.
He also pointed to the new dialogue of how we explain ourselves to each
other (such as Facebook and Twitter).
The Cheshire Cat observed that we've switched from the physics age,
the biologic age to the information age, and nowadays, it's harder to
predict what's beyond the standard model, because the speed of change
is faster.
They discussed the function of technology in SF. Doctorow said that
cyberpunks used computers for their god-like qualities because the audience
didn't know much about them. The Cheshire Cat suggested that the construct
of the singularity is about playing with the idea of what would happen
in such an instance. "How do humans relate to something bigger
than them: God, a singula4rity, society, the company they work for."
Edelman noted that stories about technology are always really stories
about humans, where the technology is a tool for exploring aspects of
human nature. To this, Tom Purdom added that if you transform characters
too far beyond human traits they become unrecognizable, and it's harder
for the audience to care.
Besides, Edelman said, "Predicting the future past five to 10
years is really just a fetish." In other words, it's nigh impossible;
just a theoretical game.
Doctorow summed it up nicely: "The future composts the past. There
is no tabula rasa." He said that sometimes SF writers want to do
that, to imagine that part of the present no longer applies. For those
purposes, invoking the singularity can help. He continued, "Do
we really have to drag the past around with us like a suitcase full
of junk we're not going to look at again?" The answer? According
to Doctorow, yes.
Ultimately, it was a very enlightening discussion, even for us non-scientists
in the audience.
Afterwards, The Gryphon and I joined The Cheshire Cat for lunch in
the hotel restaurant. I had a tuna salad wrap with a side salad instead
of French fries. We told The Cheshire Cat he'd held his own on the panel,
and it had been a great discussion.
I looked through the schedule and asked if they wanted to go to the
Dr. Horrible singalong, but neither of them were really interested.
Instead, we took a walk through the Dealer's Room.
Right inside the door was a table full of games, so naturally, we had
to stop and look. That vendor also had a chest filled with plushies.
Looking through them, I found plushies designed to look like various
microbes. I found it amusing to pull them out of the chest and say,
"Should we get hepatitis for the baby? Should we give the baby
rabies? Do you want to give the baby E. coli?"
Ultimately, we decided on the common cold, in part because it's an
octagonal plushie with eyes on it. Once the baby is past the stage of
just drooling on toys or putting them in his or her mouth, it could
be used as a ball.
We also picked up Monty Python Flux, a game I'd been wanting since
finding out about it earlier this year.
The other tables included many book sellers, including some authors
selling their own works; clothing booths (kimonos, corsets and T-shirts);
jewelry; elven costume accessories; artwork; and some music. I also
got some handmade Christmas cards from one of the artists, which feature
snowmen as comic book heroes, with amusing sayings.
(Faster-loading
version)
(from left) James L. Cambias, Kimberly Ann Kindya,
Walter Hunt, The Cheshire Cat, Michael A. Ventrella
I accompanied The Cheshire Cat to his next panel:
Social Changes No One Saw Coming
Why do we seem to be better able to predict changes in our technology
than changes in our way of life? Very few Science Fiction authors
predicted changes in our society that allowed, for example, an African
American to be elected President, legalized gay marriages or changes
in gender roles. What future changes are the majority of our authors
failing to predict now?
Kimberly Ann Kindya (mod), Walter Hunt, The Cheshire Cat, James
L. Cambias, Michael A. Ventrella
I warned The Cheshire Cat I would have to leave early in order to get
to the key note presentation a little early. Plus, I had to run out
to my car first and pick up some things.
They started by speaking about the interesting social constructs that
appeared in older SF movies, such as, Kimberly Ann Kindya pointed out,
the fact that people used to smoke on spaceships!
The Cheshire Cat noted that SF is worse at predicting technology than
social changes. And to this, Walter Hunt added that sometimes they resist
showing social changes simply because people like to imagine that things
will stay the same, regardless of the advancements of technology. The
second wave of SF, Kindya said, has shown more social changes.
Michael Ventrella added that it's not just SF writers; lots of genres
have trouble predicting the future. Hunt observed that the Cold War
writers imagined the Cold War would go on perpetually or end in a calamity.
As I had to leave, the panel was just getting to some changes that
were not anticipated, such as Kindya pointing out that there is no Big
Brother. Instead, people are voluntarily making their private lives
public through forums such as blogs, Facebook and Twitter.
I wish I could have stayed longer, but I needed to go, so I quietly
slipped out.
From the social change panel, I made for the hotel's concession area,
to buy a snack to have in my bag, should I need it. The plan was to
then grab my complete works of Edgar Allan Poe from the car and make
it to the ballroom for the key note presentation in time to arrange
an interview with Catherine
Asaro for Sunday.
Now, as fate would have it, I hadn't even made the snack panel when
I ran into Onezumi Hartstein and talked to her for a while. That did
turn out to be our longest conversation at the con, though, so I'm glad
I stopped.
By the time I'd bought a snack and grabbed my book from the car, I
arrived only about five minutes early. Asaro was nowhere to be seen,
so I asked a guy near the door, and he said that she'd gone back to
her room to get something. The problem was that I knew I'd have to leave
early for my own panel, so I'd been hoping to arrange the interview
before her keynote presentation started. She and her keyboard accompanist,
Donald Wolcott,
however, breezed in and marched straight up to the stage.
Fortunately, she gave people the opportunity to bring up pictures of
her, if they had them, to get them signed. I'd received one from her
the day before, so I brought it up on the stage and, when she went to
sign it, I told her quickly that I wouldn't be able to stay until the
end and I was hoping to meet with her tomorrow morning or afternoon.
She said that she'd be free after her 3 p.m. reading, so I arranged
to meet her in that room after it ended.
In a somewhat nontraditional format, rather than giving a speech, Asaro
and Wolcott were instead interviewed by Oz Fontecchio, a former Philcon
president and the moderator of "The Eye of Argon" reading
which I'd attended the night before.
Here are some highlights:
Wolcott's musical interest started with a Christmas gift at age 5.
Since then, he's learned classical piano, has performed in a jazz ensemble,
taught himself bass, guitar and drums, earned multiple awards in college
and is an in-demand performaner in Washington, D.C., and Maryland.
Asaro started out her career as a ballet dancer but fell in love with
science and physics in college, eventually earning a Ph.D. in physics
and continuing to write scholarly papers alongside her fiction works.
She observed that ballet dancers are often good at match, and she theorizes
it's because ballet relies on patterns, repetition and algorhythms.
She began writing in grad school and delayed her doctorate by six months
to finish some writing projects. "If you're a writer, you have
to write," she said.
About her tendency to mix genres, such as hard science with romance,
she said, "No one told me you can't do this, so I did it."
Her first book, she said, was like Romeo and Juliet in space
with some military SF thrown in.
She said that the two genres do have something in common: a scientific
SF story usually revolves around a problem that has to be solved. In
some ways, romance is the same way, except that the problem to be solved
is the relationship.
From an early age, she enjoyed reading SF but felt there needed to
be more females in it. Hence, when she began to write her own works,
she did so. She admits, though, that making them strong female characters
was not deliberate. "I wrote what I liked."
About her latest project, a musical CD/book combination, Diamond
Star, she said the book came first, but she discovered that in order
to write it she found herself needing to write lyrics. And in order
to write lyrics that made sense, she wanted to write music. So she connected
with the front man of Point Valid, who was really interested in the
project, and he helped her write the songs.
However, when it came time to promote the book, the lead singer of
Point Valid was overseas in Israel, so she placed a Craig's List ad
and found Donald Wolcott to accompany her to her public appearances.
Asaro has also been studying with a voice coach.
She and Wolcott are currently working on another CD, and she also mentioned
the idea of doing a CD based on a new paranormal romance novel. That
was all she could say at this point, she asserted.
About then, I had to leave in order to be early for my own panel, on
the poetry of Edgar Allan Poe.
(to be continued tomorrow)
|